Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!husc6!endor!albert
From: albert@endor.harvard.edu (David Albert)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: So then what's the difference between Turbo 2.0 and Quick C?
Summary: was Re: Using Turbo C with libraries compiled with Microsoft C
Message-ID: <3144@husc6.harvard.edu>
Date: 6 Jun 90 16:37:36 GMT
References: <10760@medusa.cs.purdue.edu> <1990Jun4.205834.13661@cbnewsc.att.com> <8@csource.OZ.AU>
Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu
Reply-To: albert@endor.UUCP (David Albert)
Organization: Aiken Computation Lab Harvard, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 13

>Both compilers return long/large pointers in DX:AX
>Since TC 1.5, Borland have been using identical segment naming conventions
>to Microsoft.  Besides, they can be changed in TC to suit.

etc...


So:  what are the advantages/disadvantages to Turbo C over
Microsoft Quick C?  Other than the price?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Albert		     |Only hoping isn't/what gives us strength to cope.
UUCP: ...!harvard!albert     |   Let us only hope,/but not *only* only hope.
INTERNET: albert@harvard.edu |				--Piet Hein