Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac:55080 comp.sys.mac.misc:519
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!ames!eos!shelby!lindy!slacvm!larry
From: larry@slacvm (Larry Sherman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Looking for alternatives to Edit 2.1
Message-ID: <9820@lindy.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 4 Jun 90 19:27:20 GMT
Sender: root@lindy.Stanford.EDU (Rooter)
Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Lines: 8
References:<18148@well.sf.ca.us> <1571@ns-mx.uiowa.edu>

In article <1571@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> jlhaferman@l_eld09.icaen.uiowa.edu 
(Jeffrey Lawrence Haferman) writes:
> How about either Sigma Edit or McSink (both DAs).  McSink is known as
> something else commercially, I can't remember.  McSink is in my opinion
> much better than Edit 2.1 and since it's a DA it's very convenient.


The commercial version is called VANTAGE, [Preferred Publishers]