Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!ukc!icdoc!qmw-cs!liam From: liam@cs.qmw.ac.uk (William Roberts) Newsgroups: comp.unix.aux Subject: Re: FLAME Concerning Apple's pricing of A/UX 2.0. Message-ID: <2352@sequent.cs.qmw.ac.uk> Date: 8 Jun 90 12:43:15 GMT References: <1990Jun1.185845.24189@ox.com> <2669D0E0.340B@intercon.com> <3089@ursa-major.SPDCC.COM> <6614@umd5.umd.edu> <364@three.MV.COM> Organization: Computer Science Dept, QMW, University of London, UK. Lines: 36 In <364@three.MV.COM> cory@three.MV.COM (Cory Kempf) writes: >If Apple wanted A/UX to be considered as a viable unix system, they really >should (at the VERY LEAST) provide X/Motif as part of the system, and cut >the price of the system as well (after all, people who are using A/UX are >not using MacOS -- Why should they have to pay for it?) We bought A/UX (140 systems to date) because we want to have both: we want process protection so that programming mistakes don't kill the whole operating system (we teach Computer Science which involves lots of practical programming work), but we want low cost quality document preparation that people can use without us having to teach them (our teaching timtable is already full). With A/UX 1.1 we already get this is a slightly fudged way - we do use X11 for our graphics courses and students can use it all them time if they wish. However they don't seem to want to: most of them would rather have access to MS-Word, SuperPaint and HyperCard. A/UX 2.0 will be even better, because they will have an easier time manipulating their filestore and and they will be able to run Word at the same time as developing their programs, reading mail etc etc. A/UX is a viable unix, but Unix is a commodity and there are loads of places you could buy it from. What we want (and are apparently about to get) is Unix plus all of the Macintosh stuff. -- William Roberts ARPA: liam@cs.qmw.ac.uk Queen Mary & Westfield College UUCP: liam@qmw-cs.UUCP Mile End Road AppleLink: UK0087 LONDON, E1 4NS, UK Tel: 071-975 5250 (Fax: 081-980 6533)