Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!dptg!ulysses!andante!alice!debra From: debra@alice.UUCP (Paul De Bra) Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386 Subject: Re: Tape backup performance on 386 ISA/EISA systems Keywords: tape, performance, 386 Message-ID: <10882@alice.UUCP> Date: 1 Jun 90 15:19:52 GMT References: <1990May25.123302.26061@virtech.uucp> <1990May26..841@rdk386.uucp> <1990May30.132457.6117@virtech.uucp> <1060@sixhub.UUCP> <1990May31.131341.15453@virtech.uucp> Reply-To: debra@alice.UUCP () Organization: AT&T, Bell Labs Lines: 33 In article <1990May31.131341.15453@virtech.uucp> cpcahil@virtech.UUCP (Conor P. Cahill) writes: >In article <1060@sixhub.UUCP> davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes: >>In article <1990May30.132457.6117@virtech.uucp> cpcahil@virtech.UUCP (Conor P. Cahill) writes: >>... >> I'm sorry, this is just totally wrong. You must never have had a >>fragmented disk. I have seen transfer rates as low as 300kBytes/sec with >>a fragmented disk and streaming tape which ran in fits and starts. >>... >300kBytes/sec = 18MB/min which is much faster than any tape backup that >I have seen/heard was available for a 386, so there still wouldn't be enough >gain in the backup to make that much of a difference. I think we have to distinguish backup programs here. If you do something like 'find . -print | cpio -ocB -C131072 > /dev/rmt/c0s0' the effect of a fragmented disk is not substantial. It will take cpio longer to accumulate the 1.3 megabytes (remember to add a 0 due to cpio bug) but the tape will stream while writing the buffer. If you use something like tar or any other program that reads and writes small blocks you need a very fast and unfragmented disk to keep the blocks coming at the same rate the tape drive needs them. Tape controllers have only a small buffer usually so they really need a continuous flow of small blocks. In general I would say that using such a backup program is a bad idea. If you have been using tar I would suggest either adding a pipe to dd or switching to bar. Paul. (debra@research.att.com) -- ------------------------------------------------------ |debra@research.att.com | uunet!research!debra | ------------------------------------------------------