Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen
From: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: WD 1007 Patch (was: Non-letters on SLS support)
Message-ID: <1080@sixhub.UUCP>
Date: 5 Jun 90 02:47:06 GMT
References: <2265@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> <1990May31.005321.21881@ddsw1.MCS.COM> <42@raysnec.UUCP>
Reply-To: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Distribution: na
Organization: *IX Public Access UNIX, Schenectady NY
Lines: 14

In article <42@raysnec.UUCP> shwake@raysnec.UUCP (Ray Shwake) writes:

| Don't know if Karl was speaking of the WD 1006 only or the 1006 family.
| I'm currenly running a WD 1006V with both Xenix/386 2.3.2 and ISC 2.0.2.
| Neither has ever exhibited a problem that could be remotely traced to the
| hard disk subsystem.

  Are you by chance running only one drive? I never had a problem until
I got two drives and a really fragmented filesystem.
-- 
bill davidsen - davidsen@sixhub.uucp (uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen)
    sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX
    moderator of comp.binaries.ibm.pc and 80386 mailing list
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me