Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: A Kate and Kylie Fan Speaks His Mind.
Message-ID: <1990Jun7.160738.15216@sics.se>
Date: 7 Jun 90 16:07:38 GMT
Sender: Love-Hounds-request@gaffa.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@gaffa.MIT.EDU
Organization: Swedish Institute of Computer Science, Kista
Lines: 18
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: torkel@sics.se (Torkel Franzen)


   >Really-From: Urge Conch <jsd@gaffa.MIT.EDU>

   >Please reply to me personally (e-mail) if you wish to continue this.

  What?? Do you want to deprive rec.music.gaffa of our scintillating
insights? I'm disappointed in you, Drukman. Also in your remark that

   >If you're not going to take my word for it, even though as a published
   >music critic I am fully qualified, why not take other published music
   >critics words?  I have never seen a positive notice of a Kylie record,
   >whereas I have seen several dozen glowing reviews of P.E.

  Everybody knows that music critics are know-nothing twits, who are only
in it for the money. Hypocrites the lot of them. Of course they aver
otherwise..