Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!att!cbnews!military From: chidsey@smoke.brl.mil (Irving Chidsey) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Sub communications Correction Message-ID: <1990Jun6.133015.2661@cbnews.att.com> Date: 6 Jun 90 13:30:15 GMT References: <15387@cbnews.ATT.COM> <15456@cbnews.ATT.COM> <15508@cbnews.ATT.COM> <16050@cbnews.ATT.COM> Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker) Distribution: na Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory Lines: 46 Approved: military@att.att.com From: Irving Chidsey In article <16050@cbnews.ATT.COM> moscom!de@cs.rochester.edu (Dave Esan) writes: < terryr@ogicse.ogi.edu (Terry Rooker) writes: <>From: terryr@ogicse.ogi.edu (Terry Rooker) <>In article <15456@cbnews.ATT.COM> terryr@ogicse.ogi.edu (Terry Rooker) writes: <>>I don't know what the sub communication myth is. Any elementary <>>science text will tell you radio waves to penetrate water very well. <> That should be radio waves do NOT penetrate water! < David Esan {rutgers, ames, harvard}!rochester!moscom!de Electromagnetic waves do not penetrate very far into conductors, but they do penetrate a little in the process of reflecting off the 'surface'. The actual penetration is about 1/4 wavelength as measured in the conductor. The intensity of the wave, falls off exponentialy, so a strong signal may well be measurable at slightly greater depths. This is the main reason for the very low frequency: to make the wavelength in the water long enough so that the sub can still make out the signal when it is out of sight. Unfortunately, the signal bandwidth is severely limited. Irv -- I do not have signature authority. I am not authorized to sign anything. I am not authorized to commit the BRL, the DOA, the DOD, or the US Government to anything, not even by implication. Irving L. Chidsey