Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!bellcore!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: bnrgate!.bnr.ca!hwt@uunet.uu.net (Henry Troup) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: NANP Codes AND I Want to Dial the Area Code on a Local Call Message-ID: <8986@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 15 Jun 90 14:46:38 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Reply-To: Henry Troup Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Ltd. Lines: 24 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 436, Message 5 of 12 In article <8958@accuvax.nwu.edu> "John Slater writes: >All the switch has to do is delay passing control onto an >international switch until it has received sufficient digits to check >that the call really needs it. Why should it be any more complicated >than that? Eventually, it shouldn't be more complicated than that. However, as late as last August, some parts of the U.K. still had routing codes, not area codes. A routing code is a 'context-dependent' code: the London routing code for Dundee, Scotland is 382. The London routing code for St. Andrews is 396 (?). But you dial a totally different code to call St. Andrews from Dundee. The Tayside Region phone book has an amazing number of tables of what to dial from _where_you_are_ to _where_you_want_to_call. I assume that this means the Scottish switches are old crossbar and SxS, with no smarts soever to translate anything. Henry Troup - BNR owns but does not share my opinions ..uunet!bnrgate!hwt%bwdlh490 or HWT@BNR.CA