Xref: utzoo comp.sys.sun:10101 comp.periphs.scsi:644 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request From: kevin@corp.sun.com (Kevin Sheehan {Consulting Poster Child}) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun,comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: Exabyte and se controller Keywords: Hardware Message-ID: <8872@brazos.Rice.edu> Date: 13 Jun 90 22:03:18 GMT Sender: root@rice.edu Followup-To: comp.sys.sun Organization: Sun-Spots Lines: 27 Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu X-Refs: Original: v9n207 X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 9, Issue 215, message 3 He is correct for the "sc" controller, also known as the SCSI2. We have not shipped those since the *very* early sun3 line. The "se" controller is the Enet/SCSI board used on the sun3e product line which does *not* have this problem. The SCSI2 was built before SCSI controller chips existed, and for an MSI based board it was too much to ask for ATN and the DISCO/RESEL stuff as well, when it didn't exist in peripherals at the time either. sc - SCSI2 - sun2 and early sun3 VME board si - SCSI3 - sun3 VME and 3/50 3/60 SCSI se - 6U SCSI/Enet board sw - 4/110 SCSI ... >X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 9, Issue 207, message 3 > >Some time ago i asked about a problem with our Sun 3/180 and it's Exabyte. >The machine had an Exabyte and a shoebox connected to its se0 SCSI >controller. When the Exabyte was active, for example rewinding or >searching for a file, the machine would often block. Kevin Sheehan Sun Microsystems kevin@sun.com