Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!SAYSHELL.UMD.EDU!louie From: louie@SAYSHELL.UMD.EDU (Louis A. Mamakos) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: A proposal on a new newsgroup "comp.protocols.migrate.to.iso" Message-ID: <9006111226.AA04905@sayshell.umd.edu> Date: 11 Jun 90 12:26:46 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The University of Maryland, College Park Lines: 32 Its because of things like this that I wish the TCP-IP mailing list would not be gatewayed to the USENET newsgroup comp.protcols.tcpip. The S/N ratio has decreased steadily since it was gatewayed to the newsgroup. First of all, for the USENET folks, you should know that if you want to create a new newsgroup, you should not hold discussion in comp.protocols.tcpip, but in news.groups or something. Post a pointer to it, and carry on elsewhere. Perhaps you don't know that the newsgroup is also a mailing list? comp.protocols.migrate.to.iso? Well, sometime I think that the Milo Medin view on this issue is correct; the ISO migration will turn out to be from ISO BACK to TCP/IP when network users actually want to get work done. So much for my stand on that issue. I remember when you could actually carry on a useful technical discussion on this mailing list. You know, implementations issues and performance hack and the like. Now, I know of many network weenies who can't take the time to sort through the trash to find "useful" messages. So we don't read it very much at all. Perhaps someone from DARPA, NSF, DoE, et al, could fund a person to moderate the TCP-IP mailing list, making it useful once more. Or maybe we could form a new mailing list dedicated to what the TCP-IP list used to be used for. I realize now that the Internet protocol suite has been "discovered" by the trade rags, there are lots of users that need information. I just think that there is still the need for a forum for effective technical discussion. And the TCP-IP@NIC.DDN.MIL mailing list doesn't seem to be the place to do it anymore. Louis Mamakos