Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!apple!sun-barr!newstop!sun!frisbee!jcb
From: jcb@frisbee.Sun.COM (Jim Becker)
Newsgroups: comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: CASE - The Emperor has no clothes on!
Keywords: CASE rubbish
Message-ID: <137090@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: 11 Jun 90 23:16:24 GMT
References: <37538@genrad.UUCP> <5190@stpstn.UUCP>
Sender: news@sun.Eng.Sun.COM
Lines: 30

cox@stpstn.UUCP (Brad Cox) writes:

   The trouble with Computer Aided Software  Engineering  is  that  it
   presumes the existence of such a thing as Software Engineering.


After working with CASE for a number of years, one day it dawned on me
that  *all*  software  is  developed using CASE! Ever develop software
without the aid of a computer? :-) (keypunches don't count..)


One  reason  that  hardware  is  so far ahead of software is that it's
development follows a process constrained by physical constrains.  The
CAE producers were able to leverage off the  process  and  build  more
automated development and test systems.

Because the software development process can remain  so  nebulous,  in
addition  to  there  being  multiple  paths to a correct solution, the
toughest thing about CASE is defining a system that provides an entire
solution. Thus all the partial solutions  fall  by  the  wayside  when
their limitations are touched.

It's my belief that the entire development process has to be changed.

What has happened with the Japanese Sigma  project  for  manufacturing
software? It was supposed to be out in April.

-Jim Becker
--    
	 Jim Becker / jcb%frisbee@sun.com  / Sun Microsystems