Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!agate!e260-3c!laba-1ei
From: laba-1ei@e260-3c.berkeley.edu (Joseph Chung)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Wshell -- Filename Completion?
Message-ID: <1990Jun9.071833.14693@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 9 Jun 90 07:18:33 GMT
References: <4265@uwm.edu> <3938@milton.acs.washington.edu> <1990Jun5.084738.504@agate.berkeley.edu> <7700@bula.se> <1990Jun9.022707.19982@laguna.ccsf.caltech.edu>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Reply-To: laba-1ei@e260-3c (Joseph Chung)
Distribution: comp
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 18

In article <1990Jun9.022707.19982@laguna.ccsf.caltech.edu> toddal@tybalt.caltech.edu (Todd Allendorf) writes:
>I wouldn't say THE best, for me that goes to Lattice.  I had a rather bad 
>experience with WShell and Mr. Hawes' product support.  I bought WShell this 
>January as a companion for ARexx and found it to be a nice (but not spectacular)
>shell.  I sent in my registration card and a week later I got a notice (post-
>marked Jan. 29) that WShell was being updated and I could upgrade for "just"
>$10 but if I wanted the manual that would be $20 more.  That $30 total, and 
>that's what I paid for it not two weeks earlier!

I asked the original question and since then, have sent in my registration
card.  Now if it's gonna cost me $30 to upgrade, I would not be a happy
customer.  Can anyone else confirm this price?

-jc
--
Joseph Chung
== You can always find what you're not looking for! ==
laba-1ei@web.berkeley.edu