Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!munnari.oz.au!mullian!ianr
From: ianr@mullian.ee.mu.oz.au (Ian ROWLANDS)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Tetris variants
Message-ID: <4492@munnari.oz.au>
Date: 15 Jun 90 12:28:28 GMT
References: <57314@bbn.BBN.COM> <21780@estelle.udel.EDU> <9220@pogo.WV.TEK.COM> <25279@usc.edu>
Sender: news@cs.mu.oz.au
Reply-To: ianr@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU (Ian ROWLANDS)
Organization: Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of Melbourne
Lines: 17


	I won't argue about the exact issue. I have a view, but it is probably
an uninformed one. Just like most people talking about it. Is anybody who
has commented on this a qualified lawyer? I'd like to see the proportion of 
people talking that have legal training. I think that all these "experts"
could easily fall flat on their faces.

	Some may argue different points, but basically, only a tested legal
opinion wil do me. I haven't seen anybody take on SH yet, so I guess there
won't be a test case.

				Ian

Ian Rowlands                      | ianr@mullian.ee.mu.oz.au (main)
Dept. of Electrical Engineering,  | ianr@gondwana.ecr.mu.oz.au
 (including Computer Science)     | ianr@munmurra.cs.mu.oz.au (to 7/90)
University of Melbourne           | (How can you have a funny quote in only 4 li