Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!hayes!usenet From: fnddr@acad3.fai.alaska.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec Subject: Re: "RISCy VAX" ?? Message-ID: <1990Jun11.172604.22994@hayes.fai.alaska.edu> Date: 11 Jun 90 17:26:04 GMT Sender: usenet@hayes.fai.alaska.edu (J Random USENET) Organization: University of Alaska Fairbanks Lines: 40 In article <1990Jun10.170616.6606@hod.uit.no>, tore@sfd.uit.no (Tore Larsen) writes... >The june 1st Computerworld Norway brought an article by Don Omondi wa Radoli >concerning DEC. In the article Radoli refers to a statement by Ken Olsen >saying that DEC expects to offer a "RISC-y VAX" (Not my term!) within two >years. Can anyone confirm if Ken Olson really has made this statement. > >If true, what does he mean by a RISC-y VAX and what are the consequences >for DEC's commitment to the MIPS architecture? > > >--Tore In the March 13, 1990 PC Magazine's "Abort, Retry, Fail?" humor page, they have the following under the heading, "At That Speed, They'd Better Be Part of a _Really_ Complex Instruction Set:" DEC officials also said that as many as 80 percent of VAX instructions on the VAX 9000 can be executed in one second, giving VMS customers a better perspective on the VAX architecture as compared with RISC systems. - Digital Review, October 30, 1989 While this statement seems plausible for the VAX architectures I've been using the last several years, I presume they mean "...can be executed in one cycle." Since executing all instructions in one cycle is a (the?) definition of RISC, perhaps this is what they have in mind for a RISC-y VAX...getting more of the instruction set to execute in a single cycle. Even so, I doubt DEC will drop the Mips chips anytime soon, since the Mips-based products are all that DEC has that are competitive with Sun and IBM on a $/MIPS basis. I think a Mips R6000-based machine can almost match the VAX 9000 in VUPS for about 1/10 the cost*, so it will be interesting to see how these product lines develop... *I haven't seen detailed specs on the VAX 9000 (haven't really been looking) but I think comparing costs and benchmarks for the 9000 and the Mips RC6280 might be an enlightening exercise. Don Rice Internet: fnddr@acad3.fai.alaska.edu Geophysical Institute E-mail: fnddr@alaska.bitnet University of Alaska Phone: (907) 474-7569 Fairbanks, AK 99775 Loran: 64.86N 212.16E