Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!boulder!streich
From: streich@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Mark Streich)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.programmer
Subject: Re: Looking for experience with big project upgrades from MSC 5.1 to 6.0
Message-ID: <22253@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 14 Jun 90 14:38:00 GMT
References: <1990Jun13.132843.13966@Octopus.COM> <90Jun13.221146edt.20004@me.utoronto.ca>
Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU
Reply-To: streich@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Mark Streich)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 9

In article <90Jun13.221146edt.20004@me.utoronto.ca> rwh@me.utoronto.ca (Russell Herman) writes:
>
>	3.  Global optimization isn't worth much.  The compiler spews a
>            steady stream of 'function too large for global optimizer'
>	    messages for functions that aren't absurdly large, at least
>	    by professional standards.
>
Does anyone have experience using this compiler under OS/2?  I wonder if
these memory problems go away then.