Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac:55425 comp.sys.ibm.pc:52575
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!bridge2!ngg
From: ngg@bridge2.ESD.3Com.COM (Norman Goodger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: running DOS pgm on Mac?
Message-ID: <2689@bridge2.ESD.3Com.COM>
Date: 15 Jun 90 20:24:29 GMT
References: <2185@csm9a.UUCP> <90160.091715RP1VOPER@MIAMIU.BITNET> <1990Jun12.201535.1272@ipsa.reuter.com> <90166.085822RP1VOPER@MIAMIU.BITNET>
Followup-To: comp.sys.mac
Organization: 3Com Corp., Mt. View, CA
Lines: 23

In article <90166.085822RP1VOPER@MIAMIU.BITNET> RP1VOPER@MIAMIU.BITNET (Rob Pickering *******) writes:
>The SE/30 is essentially a IIcx.  It has nothing in common with the IIx
>except the name Macintosh.  The IIx does not have a 68030 motorola chip
>it has a 68020.  Any how sorry to jump on you, it's just I paid good
>money for my SE/30 and am getting tired of the fact that people don't realize
>that you can have a color IIcx running in your home for less money than the
>actual IIcx, since the SE/30 with a color monitor is cheaper.  You just have
>to give up those 3 nubus slots.

	None of this is really accurate. The SE30 is close to a IIcx, but
	has no Nubus slots, and one processor slot. The Mac II has the 020,
	the IIx has a 030 just like the SE30, but with 6 Nubus slots. 
	The rest of your statements about a color IIcx for less an a IIcx
	makes even less sense. If you were trying to compare pricing of
	a IIcx to an SE30 with color, the IIcx would probably be cheaper,
	since video cards for the SE30 are not cheap at all. I suggest you
	carefully review your posts before sending...

-- 
Norm Goodger				SysOp - MacInfo BBS @415-795-8862
3Com Corp.				Co-SysOp FreeSoft RT - GEnie.
Enterprise Systems Division             (I disclaim anything and everything)
UUCP: {3comvax,auspex,sun}!bridge2!ngg  Internet: ngg@bridge2.ESD.3Com.COM