Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!marque!yossie From: yossie@marque.mu.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.games Subject: Re: STRATEGIC CONQUEST Message-ID: <9797@marque.mu.edu> Date: 11 Jun 90 20:42:07 GMT References: <1054300002@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <31151@ut-emx.UUCP> <47040@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> <1990Jun8.162226.5608@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <5507@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> Sender: usenet@marque.mu.edu Reply-To: yossie@marque.mu.edu (Yossie Silverman) Organization: Marquette University - Milwaukee, Wisconsin Lines: 13 Approved: usenet@marque.mu.edu In article <5507@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> ins_apw@jhunix.UUCP (Philip Wong) writes: .With the pirated version 1.0, the level wasn't jacked up to 40. The computer .simply cheated. It is virtually impossible to win it at that level. My .friend actually did win once though. Using many save and restores, he was .able to play a near perfect game and beat the computer even while cheating! Yah, I had a friend like that too (hee hee, maybe he was the same!). He could win at SC 1.0 consistantly, even though the computer was cheating all along. I believe he did shell out money for SC+ 2.0 just to see if they made the algorythms better - they didn't. He still wins, consistantly, at all levels of the game. - Yossie