Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!crackers!m2c!wpi!macman From: macman@wpi.wpi.edu (Chris Silverberg) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Re: System 7 talk: Application Menu Message-ID: <13360@wpi.wpi.edu> Date: 9 Jun 90 17:24:28 GMT References: <68206@cc.utah.edu> Reply-To: macman@wpi.wpi.edu (Chris Silverberg) Organization: Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester ,MA Lines: 31 Well, very briefly, I like the new methods of keeping the Application & window controls in the new Multifinder menu over on the right corner of the screen. This makes sense, since it's where you control what program is on top, and what programs are hidden. If there are controls that make the Apple menu icon blink, that will have to relect such changes and make the multifinder menu blink instead, if that's possible. I'm also pleased with the Apple menus flexibility. It might be pretty good if Apple took your hierarcheal (sp?) idea, and say, if you selected a menu item that is acutally a folder (or an alias of the folder), to offer a hier. menu containing the contents of that menu. That way, with some aliasing, and structuring, we could have very powerful and organized Apple menus. As far as the ability to move the multifinder controls over to the Apple menus, this personally doesn't seem "right" to me... i like the new method much better. If we had the customization to move the multifinder controls over, what would be in the "multifinder" menu... nothing? I'm a bit against offering applications in the Applemenu... but open to some well thought out finder customization, if the performance can be sustained, and it wont cause to much trouble to have an empty multifinder menu or something.... just my 2 cents. - Chris ._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. Chris Silverberg AOL: Silverberg Worcester Polytechnic Institute GEnie: C.Silverberg INTERNET: macman@wpi.wpi.edu SYSOP: Main Street U.S.A. BBS FIDONET: 322/575.1 508.832.7725 (1200/2400)