Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!texbell!tnessd!mechjgh
From: mechjgh@tnessd.UUCP (Greg Hackney )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ncr
Subject: Re: RFS is Unsupported
Message-ID: <963@tnessd.UUCP>
Date: 15 Jun 90 16:04:34 GMT
References: <3572@texbell.swbt.com> <569@ofc.Columbia.NCR.COM> <4470@uwm.edu>
Reply-To: mechjgh@tnessd.UUCP (Greg Hackney (214+464-2771))
Organization: Southwestern Bell, Network Engineering, Dallas
Lines: 17
Keywords:

In article <4470@uwm.edu> a07932@gus.AMERITECH.COM (Andrew D Kailhofer) writes:
>I too have had the same rude awakening...  "No, really...  we're
>SPECing the man pages.  You have a documentation bug."

So... what is a corporation to do in a situation like this?

     a. Mark it "unsupported" in the man pages
     b. Yell at CODAR and Sales for suggesting it might have been
        supported at one time.
     c. Yell at Engineering for releasing the code prematurely.
     d. Yell at the writers of the man pages for saying it
        was supported.
     e. Abandon the product.
     f. All of the above.
     g. Fix the product.
--
Greg