Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rice!sun-spots-request
From: jms@tardis.tymnet.com (Joe Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: NFS mounted /usr/spool/mail under SunOS 4.1
Keywords: Software
Message-ID: <8707@brazos.Rice.edu>
Date: 11 Jun 90 10:29:11 GMT
Sender: root@rice.edu
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 18
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
X-Refs:  Original: v9n181, Replies: v9n187 v9n194
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 9, Issue 201, message 14

In article <8453@brazos.Rice.edu> convex!datri@uunet.uu.net (Anthony A. Datri) writes:
>X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 9, Issue 194, message 3
>Certain people here who are against the idea of NFS mounting
>/usr/spool/mail (and doing mail on the workstations in general) say that
>the world will blow up because of the non-locking (most of our mail
>servers wouldn't be Suns).  Can anyone enlighten me on these issues?

The versions of sendmail.cf that come from Sun have the setting "OR"
turned on.  When sendmail detects that /var/spool/mail is NFS mounted, it
delivers mail to the server instead of writing directly into
/var/spool/mail.  That appears to solve the problem with multiple incoming
messages, but I'm not sure if MUSH, ELM, and all of the other mail reading
programs do the right thing while reading.

Joe Smith (408)922-6220 | SMTP: jms@tardis.tymnet.com or jms@gemini.tymnet.com
BT Tymnet Tech Services | UUCP: ...!{ames,pyramid}!oliveb!tymix!tardis!jms
PO Box 49019, MS-C41    | BIX: smithjoe | 12 PDP-10s still running! "POPJ P,"
San Jose, CA 95161-9019 | humorous dislaimer: "My Amiga speaks for me."