Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!amelia!wilbur.nas.nasa.gov!eugene
From: eugene@wilbur.nas.nasa.gov (Eugene N. Miya)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.super
Subject: Re: I/O subsystems
Message-ID: <6662@amelia.nas.nasa.gov>
Date: 11 Jun 90 17:11:08 GMT
References: <201@csinc.UUCP> <253@garth.UUCP> <202@csinc.UUCP> <292@garth.UUCP> <10280@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <359@garth.UUCP> <6374@amelia.nas.nasa.gov> <424@garth.UUCP> <6583@amelia.nas.nasa.gov> <39284@mips.mips.COM>
Sender: news@amelia.nas.nasa.gov
Reply-To: eugene@wilbur.nas.nasa.gov (Eugene N. Miya)
Distribution: na
Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA
Lines: 12

In article <39284@mips.mips.COM> mash@mips.COM (John Mashey) writes:

>1) I/O will always be a problem, for all of the usual design reasons,

	"When you can give me disks which rotate significantly
	faster than 3600 RPM, then we can start talking."
				--Don Senzig

Time to round up all the "usual" suspects. ;)

--e. nobuo miya, NASA Ames Research Center, eugene@orville.nas.nasa.gov
  {uunet,mailrus,other gateways}!ames!eugene