Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucsd!ucselx!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cica!iuvax!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!dynamo.ecn.purdue.edu!young
From: young@dynamo.ecn.purdue.edu (Mike Young)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ti
Subject: Re: TI 99/4A
Message-ID: <1990Jun14.135159.8889@ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: 14 Jun 90 13:51:59 GMT
References: <9057.266f66d7@pbs.uucp> <3065@crash.cts.com> <618@compnect.UUCP> <3145@crash.cts.com>
Sender: news@ecn.purdue.edu (USENET news)
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Lines: 19

In article <3145@crash.cts.com> guhsd000@crash.cts.com (Paula Ferris) writes:
>
>I'm not sure, as I have not tried it...
>
>It's the normal XBASIC with everything important done in assembly.
>
>
>little time, as I don't have a copy to be passed around.
>
>There are still little bugs and glitches, and it's extremly disk intensive.



	I need a clue. I wonder what subject Paula was responding to...
is there a thread going that I've managed to miss entirely???
--
						Mike Young KA9HZE
						Purdue University EE Dept.
						W. Lafayette, IN