Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!ziggy!usfvax2!tscs!tct!chip From: chip@tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix Subject: Re: Problems with SCO Unix/Xenix Summary: P. Garbha doesn't know whereof he speaks Message-ID: <2677BD9D.4AB@tct.uucp> Date: 14 Jun 90 16:38:53 GMT References: <1990Jun9.135124.16301@bbt.se> <2672BA95.6696@marob.masa.com> <1990Jun11.080015.381@bbt.se> Organization: ComDev/TCT, Sarasota, FL Lines: 13 According to pgd@bbt.se (P.Garbha): >Anyone who have taken a few programs from the net knows that only very >small programs work without being patched. Has anyone tried to port >smail 3.1? Good luck! I did the port of Smail 3.1 to Xenix/286. I've used it under Xenix/286 and Xenix/386. In fact, I just sent a message to the author using Smail 3.1. And I compiled them all using Xenix cc. SCO has problems, true. But in my experience, overall quality control isn't one of them. -- Chip Salzenberg at ComDev/TCT ,