Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!bellcore!rutgers!usc!samsung!munnari.oz.au!uhccux!bt455s39
From: bt455s39@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Carmen Hardina)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: ODT and XENIX
Summary: Just an opinion, not trying to waste bandwidth.
Message-ID: <8215@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu>
Date: 16 Jun 90 06:50:57 GMT
References: <8195@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu> <1102@dms.UUCP>
Reply-To: bt455s39@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Carmen Hardina)
Organization: University of Hawaii
Lines: 14

In article <1102@dms.UUCP> morris@dms.UUCP (Jim Morris) writes:
>Well... as ODT is a possible/natural upgrade path for XENIX users
>(Thats what we are/were doing), I figured it would be interesting/usefull
>info for those considering the change, before they made any final decisions.
>
>Was I wrong???

No, not by any means.  I agree that it is a possible upgrade path for
*SCO* XENIX users (I included), but IMHO we shouldn't forget that this
group is intended for *XENIX* users in general.  Which includes, Intel
XENIX, IBM XENIX, Altos XENIX, etc., etc...  None of which ODT discussion
is applicable to.  Just my $0.02..

					--Carmen