Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!hayes.fai.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: unhd!unhtel!paul@uunet.uu.net (Paul S. Sawyer)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: FCC Responds to Individual Complaints About AOSs
Message-ID: <9341@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 26 Jun 90 11:33:14 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: UNH Telecommunications and Network Services
Lines: 16
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 457, Message 5 of 12


In article <9224@accuvax.nwu.edu> wrf@mab.ecse.rpi.edu (Wm Randolph
Franklin) writes:

>Before writing my letter, I telephoned both ATT and FCC to determine
>the law.  FCC said unequivocally that the hotel phones must handle
>10xxx properly.  However ATT waffled; they commiserated with me but
>didn't they that the hotel had to connect me to them.  Why would they
>not assert their rights?

Maybe it's because ATT's PBX's (e.g. System 85) can't handle 9-10288, etc....


Paul S. Sawyer              uunet!unh!unhtel!paul     paul@unhtel.UUCP
UNH Telecommunications        attmail!psawyer       p_sawyer@UNHH.BITNET
Durham, NH  03824-3523      VOX: +1 603 862 3262    FAX: +1 603 862 2030