Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!decwrl!hayes.fai.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: schweige@cs.nps.navy.mil (Jeffrey M. Schweiger)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: AT&T 'COCOT' Style Payphones
Message-ID: <9305@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 26 Jun 90 16:16:35 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Reply-To: "Jeffrey M. Schweiger" <schweige@cs.nps.navy.mil>
Organization: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA
Lines: 9
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 456, Message 6 of 7


Here's a question for our Moderator or other readers of the Digest: Do
the AT&T 'Charge-a-Call' phones fall under the same (or similar) rules as
COCOT's?  It is not clear that they are customer owned, and they are
obviously not "coin operated".


Jeff Schweiger	      Standard Disclaimer   	CompuServe:  74236,1645
Internet (Milnet):				schweige@cs.nps.navy.mil