Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!hplabs!hpl-opus!steinbac
From: steinbac@hpl-opus.HP.COM (Gunter Steinbach)
Newsgroups: comp.editors
Subject: Re: word completion macro for vi
Message-ID: <62420013@hpl-opus.HP.COM>
Date: 30 Jun 90 00:19:58 GMT
References: <717@utsun.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Organization: HP Labs, High Speed Electronics Dept., Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 10

Referring to my prevoius response, well I should have experimented a
little more before I wrote it.  I can't get the buggy behavior of n go
away, but I can work around it to make the ^N and ^P macros work:

Replace the n and N in the ^N and ^P macros by the sequences ?^M and /^M
respectively (that's control-M).  Now I'm happy!

Still, does anyone have a lead on the strange behavior of n in macros?

	 Guenter Steinbach		gunter_steinbach@hplabs.hp.com