Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!snorkelwacker!ira.uka.de!fauern!tub!coma!bsp09
From: bsp09@eidfjord.cs.tu-berlin.de (Uebung bsp)
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: Help - binding <esc> on a vt in uEMACS
Message-ID: <BSP09.90Jun30010952@eidfjord.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Date: 29 Jun 90 23:09:52 GMT
References: <6400.2689ed27@vax1.tcd.ie>
	<BSP09.90Jun30001849@eidfjord.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Sender: news@coma.UUCP
Organization: Technical University of Berlin
Lines: 25
In-reply-to: bsp09@eidfjord.cs.tu-berlin.de's message of 29 Jun 90 22:18:49 GMT
To:

In article <BSP09.90Jun30001849@eidfjord.cs.tu-berlin.de> 
bsp09@eidfjord.cs.tu-berlin.de (Uebung bsp) writes:

>   In article <6400.2689ed27@vax1.tcd.ie> pkilllea@vax1.tcd.ie writes:
>
>   >   I've just begun using microEMACS 3.7 on a vt320 terminal.  
>
[ ... ]
>
>   But MicroEmacs *is* good - I had the same 3.9 on Apollo
>   SR 10.2, SunOS 4.0.3, MSDOS 3.3, Nixdorf SysV3.2, and VMS 5.3!)
>
>   Greetings, Juergen

Oh, I forgot one: I had it also running on a Siemens MX2 with SINIX
Version 2.1 (some kind of System III merged with Xenix Version 3 or
so, hardware based on National 32016 (or was it 16032 ?) and a 40 MB 
harddisk (slow!)). This System has no vi, and Siemens' editor CED 

          IS NOT THE ONE I WOULD PREFER TO MICROEMACS.

--
-----------------
Juergen Nickelsen
nickelsen@mikroperipherik.e-technik.tu-berlin.dbp.de