Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.UUCP (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: LMI Forth(s)
Message-ID: <1251.UUL1.3#5129@willett.UUCP>
Date: 1 Jul 90 03:15:20 GMT
Organization: Latest link in the ForthNet chain.  (Pgh, PA)
Lines: 17


 Date: 06-28-90 (10:32)              Number: 682 (Echo)
   To: R.BERKEY [ROBERT]             Refer#: 676
 From: RAY DUNCAN                      Read: NO
 Subj: LMI FORTH(S)                  Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE

    >...proposals other than BLK for setting the input stream.  If
    >LMI has offered... any proposals I am not aware of it...

 This is because, as far as we are concerned and for all of our existing
 source code, the inclusion of EVAL (aka EVALUATE) in ANS Forth would
 take care of our needs to manipulate the source stream.

 NET/Mail : LMI Forth Board, Los Angeles, CA (213) 306-3530             
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett through a semi-automated process.
Report problems to: uunet!willett!dwp or willett!dwp@hobbes.cert.sei.cmu.edu