Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!ames!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!texbell!nuchat!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Paths and Precedence (Re: Question about From: lines)
Message-ID: <VJF4DO7@ggpc2.ferranti.com>
Date: 4 Jul 90 11:33:55 GMT
References: <2833.2674c5b3@mccall.com> <14298@ucsd.Edu> <2836.26750678@mccall.com> <42765@cornell.UUCP> <1990Jul2.235334.5511@vmp.com> <WZE4AXD@xds13.ferranti.com> <Jul.3.16.35.40.1990.4175@turbo.bio.net>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 6

In article <Jul.3.16.35.40.1990.4175@turbo.bio.net> lear@turbo.bio.net (Eliot) writes:
> > The problem with this is that this means there's no way to say "a!(b@c)".

> Why not a!c!b?  This is what RFC 976 talks about.

Then when "c" doesn't grok "!", what do you do?
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
+1 713 274 5180.
<peter@ficc.ferranti.com>