Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!ncar!boulder!stan!dancer!imp
From: imp@dancer.Solbourne.COM (Warner Losh)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: The history of net 89
Message-ID: <1990Jun28.163501.5474@Solbourne.COM>
Date: 28 Jun 90 16:35:01 GMT
References: <42384@apple.Apple.COM> <1474@excelan.COM>
Sender: news@Solbourne.COM
Organization: Solbourne Computer, Inc.
Lines: 10

In article <1474@excelan.COM> keith@ca.excelan.com (Keith Brown) writes:
>Incidentally, Callan were an early OEM of ours so that's us too! Now I
>think about it, SGI were also. Oops!

Then why has TWG's documentation had net 89 as the example net for
many years (at least five now)?  Also, they were using net 89 as their
internal net up until about a year and a half ago.  Just curious.

-- 
Warner Losh		imp@Solbourne.COM