Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ogicse!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!tut!tut!mt87692 From: mt87692@tut.fi (Mikko Tsokkinen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: ArgAsm Message-ID: Date: 28 Jun 90 12:38:49 GMT References: <9049@life.ai.mit.edu> <1405@madnix.UUCP> <1990Jun26.103808.4048@gdr.bath.ac.uk> Sender: news@funet.fi (#News ) Organization: Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland. Lines: 18 In-Reply-To: mapjilg@gdr.bath.ac.uk's message of 26 Jun 90 10:38:08 GMT In article <1990Jun26.103808.4048@gdr.bath.ac.uk> mapjilg@gdr.bath.ac.uk (J I L Gold) writes: > Yes, ArgAsm is *fast*. However, the version I used had some annoying > bugs, and (worst of all) it doesn't come with a debugger. Its main rival > is Devpac, which although slower is still pretty nippy, and comes with > (what even Argonaut software, Argasm's authors have said) what is the > best debugger going. Also, the new Devpac Professional has '020/030 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What Devpac Professional? Where can we buy it? Does it have amiga-amiga- cross assembler? Is it faster? Better editor? > support (Argasm doesn't/didn't ?). Given the choice (and I was) I opted > for Devpac and wasn't disappointed. MITT -- Mikko "Assembler rules OK!" Tsokkinen Internet mt87692@tut.fi : UUCP tut!mt87692 : Bitnet mt87692@fintut