Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ingr!palmerc
From: palmerc@ingr.com (Chris Palmer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Robocop II sucked, and had no Amiga Graphics
Message-ID: <11246@ingr.com>
Date: 2 Jul 90 14:30:13 GMT
References: <1990Jun26.160205.20538@csmil.umich.edu> <13691@wpi.wpi.edu> <S#L$4-+@rpi.edu>
Reply-To: palmerc@ingr.UUCP (Chris Palmer)
Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, Al
Lines: 21

In article <S#L$4-+@rpi.edu> ceej@pawl.rpi.edu (Chris J Hillery) writes:
>
>I think that it's quite possible that the robot "faces" (Robo's and Cane's,
>on Robo II) were, in fact, Amiga graphics.  They looked quite similar to

I am pretty sure the Cane (Kane?) face WAS NOT done on an Amiga.  If anyone
is doing that high quality of animation, I would like to know about it.  One
thing that no one else has mentioned was the mug-shot database of criminals
that the OCP woman was searching through.  These looked very much like
Digi-View digitized faces touched up on a paint program.  Any confirmation?

BTW, the first face that comes up on the mug-shots is Irwin Kirchner, the 
director.

2nd BTW, the movie did suck.

-- 
|  Christopher M. Palmer                        #|Quote section| | | | | | ||
/  Intergraph Corporation                       #| | Closed For| |o| | | | |\
\  Internet: b14!abulafia!palmerc@ingr.com      #| | | |Repairs| | | | | | |/  
|  UUCP    : ...uunet!ingr!b14!abulafia!palmerc #| | | | | | | | | | | | | ||