Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!maytag!xenitec!usenet!wcbcs!akcs.clemon
From: akcs.clemon@wcbcs (Craig Lemon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: Motherboard revision differences
Message-ID: <[2688b902:593.2]comp.sys.amiga.hardware;1@wcbcs>
Date: 27 Jun 90 10:15:04 EDT
References: <4060@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> <12955@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Lines: 26

>Rev 3.x motherboards are the orginal "Dealer Demo" units
>Rev 4.x are the production boards with 256K DRAM chips.
>Rev 6.x are the production boards with 1M DRAM chips.
>-- 
>George Robbins - now working for,     uucp:  
>{uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!grr
>but no way officially representing:   domain: grr@cbmvax.commodore.com
>Commodore, Engineering Department     phone:  215-431-9349 (only by moonlite)

   I'm also interested in the question and answer previously stated.  I have
heard of the 2620 and 2630 not working on some 4.x motherboards due to some
sort of bus capacitors or some such thing.  I'm particularly interested in
4.2.  If the only difference is SUPPOSED to be the capacity of each DRAM,
why do the _Commodore Built_ accelerators fail to function (as I said, this
is what I've been told)?

--                            _
 Craig Lemon              // |_|               
 Kitchener, Ontario     \X/  | |  M  I  G  A   
                                               
 Amiga 2000 -- 2400 bps -- AmigaUUCP 1.03D     
 uunet!watmath!xenitec!wcbcs!lemsys!clemon
 uunet!watmath!xenitec!wcbcs!{_clemon|AKCS.clemon}
 
           ^^ Not Reliable Yet                 
         "Yes, it's my real name!!"