Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!xanth!mcnc!rlsmith
From: rlsmith@mcnc.org (Robert L. Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re:  Amiga 4000
Message-ID: <2386@speedy.mcnc.org>
Date: 30 Jun 90 15:28:58 GMT
Reply-To: rlsmith@mcnc.org (Robert L. Smith)
Distribution: na
Organization: MCNC; RTP, NC
Lines: 22


    What all Amigas need is to be acceptable to general business use.
I have banker friends who absolutely refuse to buy a computer that
omits parity on DRAM;  no Mac and no Amiga for them!  And bankers are
not alone.  I don't know what the sales improvement would be with
parity, but the Amiga multitasking and (slight) graphics advantages
over IBM and its clones would weigh into that market if RAM parity was
available.
    The other major improvement that all Amigas need is a hardware
change enabling use of the principal 68K-family program debugging
tool.  I'm speaking of Bus Error, returned for an unrecognized value
on the Address Bus.  A single-shot plus a trifle of logic would
implement that, especially if DTACK were properly left to each
peripheral.
    When Commodore wants to get serious, it should seriously consider
these fundamentals.
    (Let me hasten to add that while I've studied the 1000 closely,
I'm ignorant of detail on the 500, 2000 and up.  If Commodore has
implemented either of the above on any of those, I apologize and offer
congratulations.)

Regards, rLs