Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!peregrine!ccicpg!felix!dhw68k!zardoz.cpd.com!tmiuv0!rick From: rick@tmiuv0.uucp Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware Subject: Re: Dust in the Box (was: the 2000's noisy fan) Message-ID: <2750@tmiuv0.uucp> Date: 29 Jun 90 14:34:23 GMT References: <13405@netcom.UUCP> <12751@cbmvax.commodore.com> <10674@netcom.UUCP> Organization: Technology Marketing Inc., Irvine, CA Lines: 30 In article <10674@netcom.UUCP>, mcmahan@netcom.UUCP (Dave Mc Mahan) writes: > I was thinking about trying to > stretch a double layer of panty hose material across the front where most of > the holes are. The tough part is doing things like mouse and keyboard entry > points correctly. Those areas are also the hardest to clean. I agree with > the viewpoint that dust is generally harmless (unless it is in your monitor!) > and that overheating caused by the dust is the thing to worry about. I think that using panty hose stuff would be even more restrictive than the foam stuff. But, I'm not an airflow weenie. I use a negative ion generator to keep the dust down, but I keep it on the FAR SIDE of the room, as far away from the systems (and I have 6 running) as possible. It works pretty well. You must be careful about the static it can create, but I treat the carpets with anti-stat and the cases of the systems are grounded heavily. Like I said, it works, but it could be dangerous. I will now don my suit of armor, since I'm probably gonna get flamed for suggesting such a thing. 8-) -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- [- O] Rick Stevens ? EMail: uunet!zardoz!tmiuv0!rick -or- uunet!zardoz!xyclone!sysop V CIS: 75006,1355 (75006.1355@compuserve.com from Internet) "I'm tellin' ya, Valiant! Da whole ting stinks like yesterday's diapers!" - Baby Herman in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------