Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcrware!mwca!bill
From: bill@mwca.UUCP (Bill Sheppard)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: QuickST vs TurboST
Message-ID: <1658@mwca.UUCP>
Date: 3 Jul 90 16:46:45 GMT
References: <1990Jul2.043449.14282@cbnews.att.com>
Organization: Microware Systems Corp., Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 30

In article <1990Jul2.043449.14282@cbnews.att.com> nrc@cbnews.att.com (N. Richard Caldwell) writes:
>First a little disclaimer, I own the fourth copy of Turbo ST sold and
>I have been beta testing for SofTrek...
>In article <1996@electro.com> ignac@electro.com (Ignac Kolenko) writes:
>>...
>>Quick ST supports GDOS fonts, Turbo ST doesn't. 
>>...
>>...other Quick ST/Turbo ST comparisons
>...
>"Don't drive too slowly."                 Richard Caldwell
>                                          att!cbnews!nrc
>                                          nrc@cbnews.att.com

Can I put in a plea that this not become July's first full-fledged overblown
war of words between opposing camps? Turbo ST and Quick ST each have good
and bad points, they are both well-supported products, and the competition
between them has doubtlessly made them both much better products.

Both sides have made informative postings, let's not have it degenerate into
mindless name-calling.

(So far it hasn't, I'm just trying to prevent it).

Thanks!!!

-- 
################################################################################
#  Bill Sheppard                   #   OS-9: Seven generations beyond __/_!!   #
#  Microware Systems Corporation   #   OS-9000: 4500 times better than...      #
#######Opinions expressed are my own, though you'd be wise to adopt them!#######