Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!mailrus!uunet!munnari.oz.au!lawley From: lawley@cs.mu.OZ.AU (michael lawley) Newsgroups: comp.sys.encore Subject: Re: ANSI C and C++ for Multimax Message-ID: Date: 29 Jun 90 01:05:45 GMT References: <495@litle.litle.com> Sender: news@cs.mu.oz.au Reply-To: lawley@murtoa.cs.mu.OZ.AU Organization: Computer Science Dept., University of Melbourne, Australia. Lines: 20 In-reply-to: rpruess@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu's message of 28 Jun 90 18:16:38 GMT On 28 Jun 90 18:16:38 GMT, rpruess@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu (Rex Pruess) said: > We would like an ANSI C compiler too. What is wrong with gcc? We use it as our ANSI C compiler and are quite happy with it. It has bugs, but they haven't bothered us significantly to date. > -- > Rex Pruess, Weeg Computing Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 > rpruess@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu | rpruespb@uiamvs.bitnet | 319-335-5452 mike -- _--_|\ michael lawley (lawley@cs.mu.OZ.AU). / \ The Unicycling Systems Programmer, \_.--.*/ Melbourne University, Computer Science v