Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!pepsi!phil
From: phil@pepsi.amd.com (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: the death of the All Charge Card
Message-ID: <1990Jun28.204044.329@amd.com>
Date: 28 Jun 90 20:40:44 GMT
References: <1990Jun26.212154.2980@amd.com> <1981@cod.NOSC.MIL>
Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices; Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 15

In article <1981@cod.NOSC.MIL> ganzer@cod.nosc.mil.UUCP (Mark T. Ganzer) writes:
|Don't always assume the same path works best for everybody. In my case, I
|have a Zenith 248. I had 2.5 MB of extended memory boards for it laying

Ok, but you shouldn't assign the cost of 2.5 megs of new Zenith memory,
but rather the cost of 2.5 more megs for the SX motherboard. 1 megabyte
is around $70-80 now. Minus whatever you could sell the Zenith for
(probably someone could use the RAM chips at least).

You're right about cost of the coprocessor, for people who must
have one.

--
Phil Ngai, phil@amd.com		{uunet,decwrl,ucbvax}!amdcad!phil
PALASM 90: it's not the same old PALASM any more!