Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!pepsi!phil
From: phil@pepsi.amd.com (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: the death of the All Charge Card
Message-ID: <1990Jun29.180135.26697@amd.com>
Date: 29 Jun 90 18:01:35 GMT
References: <3341@crash.cts.com>
Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices; Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 14

In article <3341@crash.cts.com> jca@pnet01.cts.com (John C. Archambeau) writes:
|Just like my soon-to-be ex-boss (who was a regional VP for AMD), you assume
|that your way is the right and only way.  Maybe it comes from working from
|AMD?  :)

I never said my way was the only way. I just pointed out that the
ACC is not much cheaper than a solution which can run 32-bit
software, BSD 4.4, and virtual DOS machines, and the ACC is a lot
less versatile. As always, the decision on which way to go is in
your hands, not mine.

--
Phil Ngai, phil@amd.com		{uunet,decwrl,ucbvax}!amdcad!phil
PALASM 90: it's not the same old PALASM any more!