Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac.misc:972 comp.sys.mac:55932
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!mcgill-vision!snorkelwacker!apple!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!noao!arizona!gerhard
From: gerhard@cs.arizona.edu (Gerhard Mehldau)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: software piracy
Summary: Software *can* be patented
Message-ID: <22647@megaron.cs.arizona.edu>
Date: 3 Jul 90 06:14:55 GMT
References: <602@dbase.A-T.COM> <26853@bcsaic.UUCP> <8879@potomac.ads.com> <268FB564.638E@intercon.com>
Followup-To: poster
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson
Lines: 25

In article <268FB564.638E@intercon.com>, kdb@macaw.intercon.com (Kurt Baumann) writes:
> Not true.  There are patents on software.  Apple, AT&T, amoung others hold
> patents on particular bits of software.
> 
> I don't know what if any patents are held by MicroSoft, but it is possible
> to patent software under certain circumstances.  Perhaps a legal type would
> like to clarify?



  I'm not a legal type, but I do recall an article by Paul Goodman (?)
in the most recent APDAlog (Summer 90), which covers this subject, and
it states that software *is* patentable under certain circumstances.

  For more details, see the article itself.

- Gerhard



-- 
-> Gerhard Mehldau
   Dept. of Computer Science	internet: gerhard@cs.arizona.edu
   University of Arizona	uucp:     {cmcl2,noao,uunet}!arizona!gerhard
   Tucson, AZ 85721, U.S.A.	at&t:     +1 (602) 621-4632