Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!srhqla!nrcvax!neg From: neg@NRC.COM (Neal Goldsmith) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware Subject: Re: Has anyone seen the HP Laserjet III AppleTalk Option? Message-ID: <552@nrcvax.NRC.COM> Date: 28 Jun 90 17:19:07 GMT References: <4987@mace.cc.purdue.edu> Reply-To: neg@nrcvax.UUCP (Neal Goldsmith) Organization: Network Research Corp., Oxnard CA Lines: 31 In article <4987@mace.cc.purdue.edu> omalley@mace.cc.purdue.edu (John O'Malley) writes: >>In article <550@nrcvax.NRC.COM> neg@NRC.COM (Neal Goldsmith) writes: >>> I've been waiting for almost three months to get the AppleTalk kit from HP. >>> I had enough trouble getting the Postscript Cart ... >>> >>> HP has been advertising this option for over three months! Does anyone >>> know what is going on? I ordered the option from E.R.A in Palo Alto (Thanks Chris). It seems that the AT option is VERY back ordered. >The LaserJet took almost twice as long (almost 9 minutes) to print that >file (vs. the IINT's almost 5 minutes), and some of the graphical elements >were missing on the printout. But under a magnifying glass and even to >the naked eye the LaserJet printout had far better resolution. (The IINT >didn't miss printing anything, but large fonts weren't as sharp.) > Sounds like the LJIII only had 1MB of extra memory (the minimum). Using the serial link for the last 2500 pages I have NEVER had a mis-printed PM 3.02 page. I hope that the AT driver doesn't break something. I can't imagine a problem. -- Neal E. Goldsmith Network Research Corp Internet: neg@nrc.com 1620 Federal Ave #2 America Online: NEG1 Los Angeles, CA 90025 (213)479-6436