Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!ucsd!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uc!nic.MR.NET!srcsip!jhereg!wd0gol!newave!john
From: john@newave.UUCP (John A. Weeks III)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Rumor -> Loss of Mac's 20% advantage over Windows 3.0
Message-ID: <450@newave.UUCP>
Date: 30 Jun 90 02:23:47 GMT
References: <40218215MES@MSU>
Reply-To: john@newave.mn.org (John A. Weeks III)
Organization: NeWave Communications Ltd, Eden Prairie, MN
Lines: 18

In article <40218215MES@MSU> 18215MES@MSU.BITNET writes:
> There goes the 20% that Windows 3.0 couldn't do that the Mac could...

That line is perhaps the biggest piece of bullshit that I have ever
seen on USENET.  It is interesting that a religious subject such as
an operating can be quantified as "better" or "worse", but this line
suggests that it can also be measured.

As long as a sub-window cannot be opened larger than it's parent window,
I will not consider Windows 3.0 a viable graphic user interface.

-john-

-- 
===============================================================================
John A. Weeks III               (612) 942-6969               john@newave.mn.org
NeWave Communications                ...uunet!rosevax!bungia!wd0gol!newave!john
===============================================================================