Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!wang!bu-tyng!three!cory From: cory@three.MV.COM (Cory Kempf) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: SADE docs VERY disappointing! Keywords: sade, debugging Message-ID: <386@three.MV.COM> Date: 30 Jun 90 20:33:21 GMT References: <271@unf7.UUCP> Organization: Three Letter Co. Nashua, NH. Lines: 33 shite@unf7.UUCP (Stephen Hite) writes: > Subject says it all. I outlay this kinda cash (I have MPW C 3.1 bundle >and beta MPW C++) and I get the bare minimum in documentation for SADE with >no recourse such as buying a user's guide from APDA or a bookstore. > I can't honestly say that SADE is a powerful debugging environment >(although I suspect from what *is* there suggests that it can be) >because it's development team did not take the time and effort to >express it in words on paper in a well-organized and detailed manner. I have to agree. I was all excited when I first heard about SADE. I was expecting something with at least as much power/usability as the Think C debugger. Currently, SADE is last on my list of tools to use when I am trying to debug code. About the only thing that I can get it to do is allow me to single step through my C++ code. And what few variables it does allow me to look at seem to insist on coming up in pascal format (yes, it is a nit, but it IS an annoyance). I wonder if the folks at Think have though of enhancing their debugger to handle the SADE symbol output? and C++? If they do, (and are willing to make it a stand alone product) I'ld buy it. As it is, I am very disappointed with SADE, to the extent of considering shifting to the THINK environment if they ever get C++ (and accepting the loss of functionality that MPW provides). Unfortunately, since SADE is bundled in with MPW, I will probably be forced to purchase a worthless upgrade when I upgrade C++. Sigh. +C -- Cory Kempf I do speak for the company (sometimes). Three Letter Company 603 883 2474 email: cory@three.mv.com, harvard!zinn!three!cory