Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!nems!ark1!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!humu!pegasus!pilikia!art From: art@pilikia.pegasus.com (Art Neilson) Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386 Subject: Re: ISC 2.2 Installation Troubles Keywords: ISC, installation, pipelining Message-ID: <1990Jul4.083004.7159@pilikia.pegasus.com> Date: 4 Jul 90 08:30:04 GMT References: <1990Jul1.125113.970@pilikia.pegasus.com> <1990Jul3.044925.4374@pilikia.pegasus.com> <550@csource.oz.au> Organization: Pilikia, Honolulu Lines: 37 X-Local-Date: 4 Jul 90 01:30:04 PDT In article <550@csource.oz.au> david@csource.oz.au (david nugent) writes: >>Today I spoke with an engineer with Transcomputer who has *solved* >>the mysterious ISC 2.2 install disk hang problem. Evidently the >>new 2.2 release enables instruction pipelining in the 386 processor, >>something which ISC neglected to tell us poor souls. Check your >>386 processor, just below the i386 logo should be the processor >>version. If the chip is the SX211 version, you're in trouble >>because there is a bug in processor regarding instruction pipelining > > >Sorry to burst your bubble, but this just doesn't make any sense at all. > Hey. you burst no bubble. The processor replacement fixes the problem on Transcomputer motherboards with the SX211 version of the 386 chip and probably affects anyone with that chip version. If you don't have that chip version, you probably had a *different* problem. Just hit the 'n' key if the article doesn't apply to you. If just one person is saved from the particular problem which plagued me, my posting will have been worth it. >I had this dreaded problem, and after successfully installing 2.2 on >a different machine, I swapped the drive and controller back to the >original machine, where now 2.2 is running without ANY PROBLEMS AT ALL. >ZERO. ZILCH. I'm glad you got it working on your machine, really. I tried exactly what you describe, I pulled my drive and controller and installed 2.2 on my drive in a different box. After the install went successfully, I put my drive and controller back in my machine only to have the kernel panic and dump everytime it tried to load. >If the _real_ problem is anything like what you describe, then it shouldn't >run at all on that machine, no? NO, it shouldn't run on any machine with the SX211 version 80386. I'll bet you don't have this chip in your box. -- Arthur W. Neilson III | ARPA: art@pilikia.pegasus.com Bank of Hawaii Tech Support | UUCP: uunet!ucsd!nosc!pegasus!pilikia!art