Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!bacchus.pa.dec.com!wsl.dec.com!klee
From: klee@wsl.dec.com (Ken Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: dxcalendar woes
Keywords: dxcalendar 3.1d
Message-ID: <1990Jul3.195913.18312@wrl.dec.com>
Date: 3 Jul 90 19:59:13 GMT
References: <1990Jul3.004218.24220@caen.engin.umich.edu>
Sender: news@wrl.dec.com (News)
Reply-To: klee@wsl.dec.com
Distribution: usa
Organization: DEC Western Software Laboratory
Lines: 16


In article <1990Jul3.004218.24220@caen.engin.umich.edu>,
grue@caen.engin.umich.edu (Paul Howell) writes:
|> Has anybody on the net run dxcalendar vers. 3.1d with an R4 server?  If so,
|> is there a fix for this problem?

This is a known problem, caused because the MIT X11R4 sample server is
much more careful with the X protocol than was the X11R3 sample server
or the DEC servers.  Many MIT X11R3 clients also broke because of
this.  If you have source code, the fix is a one-liner.  Fixed binaries
will be shipped in one of the next releases.

Ken Lee
DEC Western Software Laboratory, Palo Alto, Calif.
Internet: klee@wsl.dec.com
uucp: uunet!decwrl!klee