Xref: utzoo comp.unix.i386:6322 comp.unix.xenix:12249
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen
From: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386,comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: Xenix vs. UNIX
Message-ID: <1216@sixhub.UUCP>
Date: 29 Jun 90 17:33:13 GMT
References: <3304@crash.cts.com>
Reply-To: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Followup-To: comp.unix.i386
Organization: *IX Public Access UNIX, Schenectady NY
Lines: 17

In article <3304@crash.cts.com> jca@pnet01.cts.com (John C. Archambeau) writes:

| >  My own feeling is that many users want NFS, TCP, and X, along with a
| >solid UNIX, and almost any reasonable window manager. They also want it
| >at low cost (<$1k). I believe that there will be a version of V.4 out
| >which meets these objectives in the *very* near future.
| 
| ESIX meets the price a helluva lot better than SCO.

  Okay, tell me what to order, since Everex can't. 2 user ESIX + NFS
from ISC comes to more than ODT, either list or street price. Something
like 20% as I recall.
-- 
bill davidsen - davidsen@sixhub.uucp (uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen)
    sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX
    moderator of comp.binaries.ibm.pc and 80386 mailing list
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me