Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!aplcen!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!mcnc!ncsuvx!news From: willis@ecoult.ncsu.edu (Bill Willis) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: Motif -> Open Look look & feel Keywords: motif open look openlook Message-ID: <1990Jun29.033504.5003@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> Date: 29 Jun 90 03:35:04 GMT References: <2986@osc.COM> <1990Jun28.111050.17353@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> <138082@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> Sender: news@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu (USENET News System) Reply-To: willis@ecoult.ncsu.edu (Bill Willis) Lines: 88 I didn't mean to start something, but here goes... In article <138082@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>, patl@bodacia.Eng.Sun.COM (Pat Lashley) writes: > > 1) Count the number of applications actually shipping. OpenLook wins > by almost 2:1. Count the number of SunView applications total. > Easily the second most widely used look and feel in the world. > Think about how easy most of them are to port using xview.... I was counting X applications only and counting those that I know of under development. I do not believe that the 2:1 number holds. For another measure, and remember we need to pick what will be delivering next fall instead of now, count the number of time Motif is mentioned in your favorite, non-biased trade journal and count the time OpenLook is mentioned. This may seem trivial, but I think it represents something. > > 2) The XView OpenLook toolkit source is freely-redistributable; and > included with the X11R4 source; you have to pay for Motif. Not > just to develop using it, but a per-customer right-to use. I'm > not about to spend the bucks for a Motif developer's licence for > my Amiga at home when I will be able to get the OpenLook toolkits > with X11. I pay nothing for Motif (yes it is imbedded in the workstation price) unless I want source. The libraries come with most of the workstations that I order and it is supported by the vendor. I do not HAVE to get R4 or build it or mess with anything. Now, I know that Motif isn't very mature yet. In fact, it leaks like a sieve in many cases, but, it will improve, and we have applications running under Motif running on 7 platforms now and we only had to build it ourselves for the Sun systems. > > 3) Two OpenLook toolkits are provided with the SysV R.4 distribution and > in the Sun OpenWindows package. (OpenWindows is available to Sun > users for a nominal media charge. The right-to-use is included in > your SunOS licence.) Again, Motif toolkits are provided with nearly everything we are interested in. If it isn't provided now, it soon will be, or it is available for the asking. DG, Digital, HP/Apollo, IBM, Solbourne, SCO, etc.... The only significant player missing is Sun. > > 4) OpenLook defines a 2D look which works much better on monochrome and > low-res displays. (Have you ever seen Motif on monochrome? Fuzzy > looking isn't it...) We have defined monochrome resources which yield a perfectly acceptable appearance for Motif.... > > 5) OpenLook has a smoother, more-consistant user interface. (Ok, this one > borders on opinion instead of pure fact. :-) It doesn't border on opinion, it clearly is an opinion :-) BTW, many of the statements that I make here are also opinions. But, they come from a lot of experience in this market place. I will not argue technical superiority of either toolkit. We have used both and found significant problems with both. But from the marketplace and recent announcements, the race nearly is over and the leader is clear. I hear that UI is close to endorsing Motif as a toolkit. As I understand it they only have to see that it works under SysV R.4. It will... I would not be surprised to see many major customers requiring vendor supplied Motif libraries in the near future. Bill Willis, Director willis@ecovsa.ncsu.edu Engineering Computer Operations willis%ecovsa@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu Box 7901, School of Engineering North Carolina State University (919) 737-2458 We have met the enemy, and they are us --- Pogo