Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!ics.com!david
From: david@ics.com (David B. Lewis)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.motif
Subject: UIL grammar questions
Message-ID: <9006271857.AA25756@BU.EDU>
Date: 27 Jun 90 18:37:21 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 14


(sorry if this is a repost; the mail never made it back here.)

Both of these work, almost certainly through the courtesy of a coincidence
of implementation. Are they acceptable practice, and can we expect that
they will continue to work:

1) having a child control'ed by multiple parents

2) having a parent control multiple children all of the same name and type;
e.g. I want ten toggle buttons, so I control my toggle button 10 times and
deal with differences through an XmNcreateCallback.

Thanks.