Xref: utzoo sci.skeptic:4036 sci.physics:13412 sci.bio:3196 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ucbvax!agate!shelby!portia.stanford.edu!dhinds From: dhinds@portia.Stanford.EDU (David Hinds) Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,sci.physics,sci.bio Subject: Re: Question about Rupert Sheldrake Message-ID: <1990Jul1.220250.24364@portia.Stanford.EDU> Date: 1 Jul 90 22:02:50 GMT References: <18024@ttidca.TTI.COM> <18066@ttidca.TTI.COM> Organization: AIR, Stanford Universit Lines: 36 In article <18066@ttidca.TTI.COM> jackson@ttidca.TTI.COM (Dick Jackson) writes: > >As I implied, I am not an expert, but an objective scale for visual >appearance differentiation could be constructed using the follwing types >of parameters: > > Hair color > Nose shape > Nose size > Eye color > Ratio of eye separation to head size > and on, and on. > >You would have a large number of these items. You could measure the >variability of each one for each species and come up with a grand score. >As I said, I believe that something like this has been done. > >The fact that man is a social animal and "altruistic" in the ethological >sense is one reason adduced for human variability. I won't spell it out. >Dogs are social animals too, but as someone said, they have been hopeless >mucked up by ours truly. Consider wolves however, although I have not done >the proposed objective study, it seems clear to me that within a wolf type >individuals are very much alike (same hair color, eye color, etc). > It seems that the only truly fair measure of individual differences would have to be the MOST subjective: ask whether creatures of the species being considered have more/less trouble telling EACHOTHER apart, rather than whether WE can tell them apart. It seems to me that in lots of these species in which individuals are "very much alike", individuals have no difficulty distinguishing mates/siblings/offspring from others. One might use genetic diversity as an objective measure, but I fear that humans would lose on that count as well. Does anyone have any data on this? -David Hinds dhinds@popserver.stanford.edu